Please enable javascript to view this site.
Kolaveri Di?
Select Page
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Searching...
Series 1-1 after India surrender to clinical England
England
's Moeen Ali (L) acknowledges the crowd by holding the ball
after
taking his fifth wicket during the third cricket test match against
India
at the Rose Bowl cricket ground, Southampton, in
England
.
After 10 Tests without a victory,
England
conjured up the perfect Test at the Ageas Bowl to snap the streak: batsmen scored runs, bowlers took wickets and
India
were never given an inch.
Given little over four sessions and 132 overs to save the match,
India
folded inside two and 66.4 overs. Four wickets were lost on the fourth evening, and resuming on 112 for 4, the last six fell in a heap on the final morning as
India
folded for 178.
Moeen finished with 6 for 67, giving him eight wickets in the match and 15 in the series, but Anderson's first-innings five-wicket haul turned out to be game-changing.While
India
succeeded at Lord's for sticking to a gameplan, they fell to
England
's superior skill at Southampton.
Where Anderson bowled with supreme control and excelled in his partnership with Stuart Broad, Bhuvneshwar Kumar was left with too much to do.
In the absence of Ishant Sharma and Mohammed Shami's lack of form, the medium-pacer's performance dropped throughout the game.
Ajinkya Rahane's second half-century of the match wasn't enough as batsmen continued to be confounded by Moeen's accuracy and spin.
Four of the last six wickets fell to Moeen and three of them - including Ravindra Jadeja - were bowled.
Despite the first-session implosion, however, allowing
England
to score 569 for 7 in five sessions meant
India
were behind the eight ball.
While
England
needed 25 balls to break through on the fourth morning, Anderson struck with his second ball of the day as he forced an outside edge from Rohit Sharma for 6.
India
hadn't added a run to their overnight score, and eight runs later MS Dhoni was sent back in the same fashion. Wickets continued to tumble even as Rahane compiled a half-century.
Lord's was tailor-made for Jadeja; Southampton was anything but.
India
's tail couldn't provide the same resistance we have become accustomed to on this tour, and as Pankaj Singh was castled by Moeen for his sixth wicket, the collapse from day three began to ring louder.
The two changes
India
made to their winning side will continue to rankle as Pankaj and Rohit Sharma couldn't make a strong impression.
Replacing Ishant Sharma was always going to be tough, and for all of Pankaj's misfortune, not having a wicket against his name will make his selection difficult for Old Trafford.
Stuart Binny was replaced by Rohit to bolster the batting, but the Mumbai batsman's first-innings dismissal will not be an encouraging image.
England
's James Anderson looks down at the ball as he walks back before beginning his run in to bowl during the fifth and final day of the third cricket Test match of the series between
England
and
India
at The Ageas Bowl in Southampton, on July 31, 2014.
England
's James Anderson, third left, celebrates with his teammates
after
catching out
India
's Bhuvneshwar Kumar off a Moeen Ali, second right, delivery during the fifth and final day of the third cricket test match of the series between
England
and
India
at The Ageas Bowl, in Southampton, on July 31, 2014.
England
's James Anderson looks on
after
the third test cricket match against
India
at the Rose Bowl cricket ground, in
England
July 31, 2014.
England
's James Anderson (R) poses for a picture with fans
after
winning the third cricket Test match between
England
and
India
at The Aegeas Bowl cricket ground, in Southampton,
England
, on July 31, 2014.
England
captain Alastair Cook, center, applauds as he walks off the field of play with man-of-the-match James Anderson, background left, and Ian Bell, background right,
after
defeating
India
on the fifth and final day of the third cricket test match of the series between
England
and
India
at The Ageas Bowl, in Southampton,
England
, Thursday, on July 31, 2014.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.
‹
›
Home
View web version
Back to top!
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.